Key Takeaways
- Financial disparities are significant: High-income families ($100,000+) spend nearly 3x more on youth sports ($1,590/year) than low-income families ($604/year).
- Pressure to specialize starts early: About 25% of parents feel significant pressure to encourage sport specialization, with greater pressure in urban areas and higher-income households.
- Race and geography matter: Parents of Black children report more inappropriate pressure/exploitation (25.8%) compared to White parents (17.8%), with urban parents reporting the highest rates (26.6%).
- Climate impacts are widespread: Youth sports teams lost an average of 7 days to climate-related cancellations in 2024, with nearly half (47.9%) of parents open to changing sport seasons.
- Coaching priorities misaligned: Parents ranked “creating a safe environment” as the least important coaching philosophy, while “supporting athletes’ health and fitness” was most important.
Full 2024 Project Play Aspen Institute Parenting Survey FINAL REPORT
Introduction: Understanding the Youth Sports Landscape
Youth sports in America represent a complex ecosystem involving parents, children, coaches, organizations, and communities. The Aspen Institute’s Sports & Society Program recently commissioned a comprehensive national study to better understand parent perceptions of youth sports across the United States. Conducted in Fall 2024, this research offers unprecedented insights into participation patterns, parental involvement, and the characteristics of youth sports settings.
The survey captured responses from 1,848 parents whose children regularly participate in one or more youth sports. The findings reveal striking differences across demographics, geographies, and sports—differences that impact how children experience athletics and how families navigate the youth sports system.
Participation Patterns: Who Plays What and Where
Basketball (41.9%), soccer (24.1%), and baseball (23.1%) emerged as the most popular sports among youth athletes. Football—considering both tackle (16.3%) and flag (10.6%) variations—remains a significant presence in the youth sports landscape, with 26.9% of athletes participating in one or both versions.
When asked about participation settings, the data revealed interesting patterns:
- Community-based programs (42.6%)
- Free play settings (41.3%)
- Interscholastic school sports (40.4%)
- Intramural sports (29.9%)
- Travel/elite or club settings (17.3%)
- Independent training (14.1%)
Urban-Suburban-Rural Differences in Participation
Geographic location significantly influences how children engage in sports. Urban children participate more frequently in free play, individual practice, and competition. Meanwhile, suburban children engage more often in coach-led practices.
“The difference in structured versus unstructured play opportunities across community types reflects underlying infrastructure advantages and constraints,” notes Dr. Travis Dorsch, associate professor and founding director of the Families in Sport Lab at Utah State University, who co-led the research.
Sport Seasonality and Specialization Pressure
Most children (47.8%) participate in their primary sport for only 1-4 months per year, with 31.7% participating 5-8 months and 20.5% participating 9-12 months annually. This seasonal approach aligns with developmental best practices but faces pressure from various sources encouraging specialization.
About one in four parents (24.6%) report feeling substantial pressure from various sources to have their child specialize in a single sport. This pressure comes from:
- School team coaches (24.8% report high pressure)
- The child themselves (24.6%)
- Society at large (24.7%)
- Other parents (22.5%)
- Non-school team/club coaches (23.3%)
Urban parents report significantly higher specialization pressure than suburban or rural parents. Similarly, parents from higher-income households ($100,000+) feel greater pressure than middle- or lower-income parents. This raises important questions about how socioeconomic factors might influence expectations around sport performance and advancement.
The Socioeconomics of Youth Sports
The Financial Burden of Participation
The survey revealed stark financial disparities in youth sports spending. On average, families spent $1,015.64 annually on their child’s primary sport, with additional costs of $475.02 for secondary sports.
However, these averages mask significant income-based differences:
- Low-income families (<$50,000): $604.01/year on primary sport
- Middle-income families ($50,000-$99,999): $961.20/year on primary sport
- High-income families ($100,000+): $1,590.61/year on primary sport
These figures highlight that high-income families spend nearly three times more than low-income families on their child’s primary sport.
The cost breakdown reveals where families allocate their youth sports budget:
- Travel and lodging: $278.03 (27.4% of total)
- Team registrations: $196.98 (19.4%)
- Lessons and instruction: $183.36 (18.1%)
- Equipment and uniforms: $164.59 (16.2%)
- Camps or athletic schools: $148.44 (14.6%)
- Other expenses: $42.75 (4.2%)
Sport-specific expenses also vary dramatically. Dance emerged as the most expensive primary sport by far, with annual costs averaging $2,048.31—nearly twice as much as baseball ($1,112.50) and four times more than flag football ($444.04).
Time Investment: The Hidden Cost
Beyond financial costs, parents invest significant time in their children’s sports participation. On days with sporting activities, parents spend an average of 202.74 minutes (over 3 hours) engaged in sport-related activities:
- Attending practices/competitions: 65.21 minutes
- Maintaining equipment/uniforms: 30.29 minutes
- Driving to practice/competition: 27.56 minutes
- Talking about sport experiences: 26.60 minutes
- Communicating with other parents: 20.06 minutes
- Preparing sport-related meals: 18.21 minutes
- Communicating with coaches: 16.92 minutes
Rural parents report spending more time (225.23 minutes) compared to suburban parents (208.08 minutes) and urban parents (189.22 minutes). Parents of older children (ages 15-18) also invest more time (222.6 minutes) than those with younger children (ages 6-10, 179.3 minutes).
Volunteer Contributions and Community Engagement
The survey found that 61.6% of parents volunteer in some capacity with their child’s sports teams or clubs. Notably, urban parents (68.1%) have higher volunteer rates than suburban (57.5%) or rural (54.9%) parents.
The most common volunteer roles include:
- Team parent (43.6%)
- Concession stand/ticket sales (16.4%)
- Coach (14.5%)
- Referee/official (7.1%)
- Administrator (6.4%)
- Athletic trainer/medical support (4.2%)
Parents invest an average of 4.21 hours per week in volunteer roles, with urban parents (4.93 hours) contributing more volunteer time than suburban (3.70 hours) or rural (3.67 hours) parents.
Race and socioeconomic status also influence volunteer patterns. Parents of Black and Hispanic children volunteer at higher rates and for more hours than parents of White children. Similarly, parents from households making $100,000+ volunteer at higher rates (66.4%) than those from households making under $50,000 (57.4%).
Well-being Benefits and Nutrition Impacts
Parents consistently reported positive impacts of regular sport participation on their children’s well-being:
- During regular sport engagement:
- 84.4% reported increased physical fitness
- 79.8% reported increased social well-being
- 75.1% reported increased mental health
- 73.5% reported increased emotional control
- When not regularly engaged in sport:
- 32.7% reported decreased physical fitness
- 27.1% reported decreased mental health
- 24.4% reported decreased social well-being
- 23.8% reported decreased emotional control
However, youth sports participation also impacts family nutrition. Families eat an average of 2.52 meals out per week due to sports schedules. Over one-third of parents (35.9%) believe sports commitments contribute to less healthy eating habits.
Urban families report eating out more frequently (2.84 meals/week) than suburban (2.30) or rural (2.23) families. Parents of Black and Hispanic children also report more frequent restaurant meals (2.99 and 2.86 meals/week, respectively) than parents of White children (2.33).
Sports, Race, and Inequality
The survey revealed several concerning racial disparities in youth sports experiences:
Exposure to Inappropriate Pressure
Parents of minority children were more likely to report their child being subjected to inappropriate pressure or exploitation by coaches or adults:
- Black parents: 25.8%
- Hispanic parents: 24.2%
- White parents: 17.8%
This disparity was even more pronounced in urban communities, where 26.6% of parents reported inappropriate pressure or exploitation—twice the rate of rural parents (13.1%).
Participation Patterns
The data revealed differences in how children from different racial backgrounds engage in sports:
- Black children engage more in free play, intramural, and independent training
- White children participate more in community-based, interscholastic, and travel/elite/club settings
- Minority children typically participate more days per week across all activity types
Parents of Black children were more than twice as likely as White parents to believe their child’s school sports program prohibits multi-sport participation.
College and Professional Aspirations
Parents of Black children demonstrated higher confidence in their children’s athletic future, with:
- 26.6% believing their child could play Division I college sports (vs. 20.5% of White parents)
- 17.8% believing their child could play professionally (vs. 9.4% of White parents)
Climate Change and Youth Sports
Climate disruptions have become increasingly relevant to youth sports scheduling. Parents reported an average of 6.93 days of cancelled practices or competitions due to:
- Very hot temperatures (2.40 days)
- Changing winters (2.08 days)
- Wildfires or wildfire smoke (1.28 days)
- Flooding (1.30 days)
The impacts were not equally distributed:
- Urban teams reported more cancellations due to extreme heat and flooding
- California parents reported the most cancellations overall (13.15 days)
- Parents of Black children reported significantly more climate-related cancellations than others
Nearly half of all parents (47.9%) expressed openness to changing their child’s primary sport season to mitigate climate impacts. Urban parents (54.3%) were most amenable to seasonal changes.
Coaching Philosophy and Training Priorities
Philosophy Gaps
Parents identified their priorities for coaching philosophies in the following order:
- Supporting athletes in being healthy and fit
- Distributing playing time in a fair manner
- Helping athletes learn new sport-specific skills
- Helping athletes learn new life skills
- Creating a sense of belonging
- Making sure athletes have fun
- Promoting good sportsmanship
- Fostering a love of sport
- Winning games or competitions
- Creating a safe environment to prevent injuries
Notably, “winning” ranked ninth out of ten priorities, while “creating a safe environment” ranked last—a surprising finding given concerns about youth sports safety.
Training Priorities
Parents ranked desired coach trainings as follows:
- Injury prevention
- CPR and first aid
- Abuse prevention
- Coaching tactics and strategy
- Sport skills and techniques
- Relationship building
- Performance anxiety management
- Motivational techniques
- Mental health support
- Effective communication
- Life skill development
- Trauma-informed practices
Background Checks and Safety
Nearly nine in ten parents (87.9%) believe coaches should undergo mandatory criminal background checks, but only 66% reported their child’s coach had actually completed one.
Geographic Differences: The Urban-Rural Divide
The survey highlighted significant differences in youth sports experiences across urban, suburban, and rural communities:
Satisfaction Levels
Urban parents reported higher satisfaction across all measured aspects of youth sports:
- Sport culture in the US (4.00/5 vs. 3.68-3.69/5)
- Community youth sport opportunities (4.05/5 vs. 3.89-3.98/5)
- Local facilities (4.01/5 vs. 3.75-3.86/5)
- Organizations (4.11/5 vs. 3.95-4.02/5)
- Coaches (4.15/5 vs. 4.05-4.12/5)
- Themselves as parents (4.15/5 vs. 4.09-4.12/5)
Playing Time Philosophy
Urban parents were more likely to believe the best players should receive playing time (14.9%) compared to suburban (7.5%) or rural (8.4%) parents. This aligned with actual coaching practices, where urban parents reported a greater emphasis on playing the best athletes.
Conclusion: Charting a Path Forward
The 2024 National Parenting Survey offers a comprehensive view of the youth sports landscape in America. The data reveals persistent inequities tied to socioeconomic status, race, and geography, while highlighting widespread concerns about specialization pressure, climate impacts, and coaching priorities.
To create a more equitable and positive youth sports experience, stakeholders should consider:
- Addressing financial barriers: Developing sliding-scale fee structures, equipment exchange programs, and community-based transportation solutions to improve access for lower-income families.
- Re-examining specialization pressure: Educating parents, coaches, and children about the developmental benefits of multi-sport participation and the risks of early specialization.
- Enhancing coach training: Prioritizing both safety and developmental approaches in coach education, with particular attention to creating supportive environments for all children.
- Climate adaptation planning: Developing flexible scheduling models and facility improvements to mitigate climate-related disruptions.
- Focusing on equity: Implementing specific initiatives to address racial and geographic disparities in youth sports experiences.
The youth sports ecosystem has shown remarkable resilience through recent challenges, but this research suggests significant room for improvement. By addressing these key findings, stakeholders can work toward a more inclusive, supportive, and beneficial sports experience for all children.
YSBR provides this content on an “as is” basis without any warranties, express or implied. We do not assume responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, legality, reliability, or use of the information, including any images, videos, or licenses associated with this article. For any concerns, including copyright issues or complaints, please contact YSBR directly.
