Key Takeaways
- The Sports Facilities Companies (SFC) has significantly expanded its ice venue portfolio, acquiring management of 13 ice rinks across 11 states plus two community centers from Rink Management Services (RMS)
- This strategic expansion positions SFC as a dominant leader in ice facility management, now overseeing 20 ice rinks nationwide including prestigious venues in major metropolitan markets
- The acquisition demonstrates a growing trend of consolidation within recreational facility management, offering economies of scale and operational efficiencies
- Communities can expect enhanced programming, improved operational efficiency, and increased accessibility at these transitioned facilities
- The partnership model between SFC and RMS represents a collaborative approach to industry growth rather than purely competitive market dynamics
The Changing Landscape of Recreational Facility Management
In today’s competitive recreational facility marketplace, strategic acquisitions and partnerships have become increasingly vital for sustainable growth and market leadership. The recent expansion by The Sports Facilities Companies (SFC) marks a significant shift in the ice rink management sector, demonstrating how industry consolidation can potentially benefit communities, operators, and athletes alike.
On May 22, 2025, SFC announced a transformative agreement with Rink Management Services (RMS) that dramatically expands its ice rink management portfolio. Through this strategic move, SFC has assumed management responsibilities for 13 ice rinks spread across 11 states, along with two additional community centers. This expansion solidifies SFC’s position as an industry leader in recreational facility management, particularly in the specialized ice venue sector.
“SFC continues to expand our presence as a leader in ice rink management, and this is an exciting step in that journey,” said Jason Clement, CEO of The Sports Facilities Companies. “RMS has built a strong footprint in the industry, and by integrating their experience with our proven approach to operations and community service, we are enhancing our ability to deliver exceptional outcomes for athletes, guests, and the communities we serve.”
The significance of this expansion extends beyond mere numbers. It represents a strategic consolidation within an industry that has traditionally been fragmented, with numerous local and regional operators managing facilities independently. This shift towards larger management networks offers potential benefits including operational efficiencies, enhanced programming capabilities, and increased financial stability for these community assets.
Understanding the Strategic Value of Portfolio Expansion
Industry Consolidation as a Growth Strategy
The recreational facility management industry has historically operated as a patchwork of independent operators, municipal managers, and regional companies. However, the trend toward consolidation has accelerated in recent years, driven by several key factors:
- Economies of Scale: Larger management companies can leverage their size to negotiate better vendor contracts, implement standardized operational procedures, and reduce overall costs.
- Specialized Expertise: Managing ice facilities requires unique technical knowledge and operational experience. Companies like SFC can deploy specialized teams across multiple facilities.
- Technology Investment: Centralized management allows for more significant investments in technology platforms for operations, customer service, and programming.
- Risk Mitigation: Diversification across multiple facilities in different geographic regions helps protect against localized economic downturns or seasonal fluctuations.
This particular acquisition demonstrates a thoughtful approach to growth. Rather than simply acquiring physical assets, SFC has structured the deal to include the operational leadership and staff from RMS, preserving institutional knowledge while integrating these professionals into SFC’s broader network.
Geographic Diversification Strategy
The portfolio acquisition reveals a sophisticated geographic strategy. The 13 ice rinks now under SFC management span 11 different states, providing the company with a truly national footprint. This geographic diversification includes prestigious locations in major urban centers:
- Bryant Park Winter Village Ice Rink (New York, NY)
- McCormick Tribune Ice Rink (Chicago, IL)
- Washington Harbour Ice Rink (Washington, DC)
- Industry City Ice Rink (New York, NY)
This coast-to-coast presence enables SFC to establish relationships with national sponsors, implement standardized best practices, and create programming opportunities that span multiple regions. For communities being served, this translates to the potential for higher-quality experiences influenced by innovations and successes from across the network.
The Collaborative Approach to Market Leadership
Partnership Models in Facility Management
What makes this particular expansion noteworthy is its collaborative nature. Rather than a complete acquisition eliminating RMS from the marketplace, the agreement allows RMS to maintain a smaller portfolio of leased agreements while working alongside SFC on future strategic opportunities.
Tom Hillgrove, President of RMS, summarized this approach: “We are excited to see these facilities transition to SFC, a company with a proven track record of success in community-focused facility management. RMS will continue to operate independently with our leased agreements while working alongside SFC to further strengthen the ice rink industry.”
This partnership model represents a maturation in the recreational facility management industry, recognizing that collaborative approaches can sometimes yield better results than purely competitive dynamics. For communities being served, this approach helps ensure continuity while introducing new resources and capabilities.
Integration of Expertise and Resources
The integration of RMS operational leadership and staff into the SFC network serves multiple strategic purposes:
- Knowledge Retention: Preserving institutional knowledge about each facility’s unique operational characteristics and community needs.
- Talent Acquisition: In a specialized industry with a limited talent pool, acquiring experienced professionals is often as valuable as acquiring physical assets.
- Cultural Integration: Bringing together best practices from both organizations to create enhanced operational models.
- Market Perception: Demonstrating a commitment to continuity and service quality rather than disruptive change.
Kelly Kryukov, Senior Vice President of Ice Venue Operations at SFC, emphasized the community focus of this expansion: “We are thrilled to bring these facilities into the SFC family and continue our momentum as a leader in ice rink management. Ice rinks serve as vital community hubs—whether it’s for youth hockey, figure skating, or public skating sessions. Our focus is on elevating these venues by enhancing programming, improving operational efficiency, and ensuring they remain accessible and welcoming spaces for all athletes and families.”
Portfolio Diversity: Strategic Considerations in Facility Management
Balance Between Seasonal and Year-Round Venues
A closer examination of the acquired facilities reveals a sophisticated strategy balancing seasonal and year-round operations. The portfolio includes:
- Seasonal Outdoor Venues: Facilities like Bryant Park Winter Village Ice Rink and Washington Harbour Ice Rink operate primarily during winter months, generating significant revenue during peak seasons but requiring specialized seasonal transition strategies.
- Year-Round Indoor Facilities: Venues such as the Wichita Ice Center and Ice in Paradise offer consistent programming throughout the year, providing stable revenue streams and community engagement opportunities.
- Mixed-Use Community Centers: The inclusion of non-ice facilities like the Romulus Athletic Center and Safari Island Community Center demonstrates recognition of the value of diversified recreational offerings.
This balanced approach helps SFC manage seasonal revenue fluctuations while maintaining consistent operational capacity throughout the year. For communities, this translates to more sustainable recreational assets with programming that evolves with seasonal interests and needs.
Urban Centers vs. Suburban Communities
The geographic distribution also reveals a strategic balance between high-profile urban locations and community-centered suburban facilities:
- Urban Showcase Venues: Facilities in New York, Chicago, and Washington DC serve as high-visibility venues that enhance brand recognition and create opportunities for premium sponsorships and events.
- Suburban Community Hubs: Locations in smaller markets like Waconia, Minnesota and Goleta, California function more as community recreation centers, serving local residents with consistent programming and accessibility.
This balanced approach allows SFC to leverage the prestige and visibility of major market venues while building deep community relationships through suburban facilities. The operational expertise gained in each environment can inform improvements across the entire network.
Operational Excellence in Recreational Facility Management
Technical Challenges in Ice Facility Operations
Managing ice facilities presents unique operational challenges that require specialized expertise:
- Energy Management: Ice rinks are among the most energy-intensive recreational facilities to operate, requiring sophisticated systems for refrigeration, dehumidification, and climate control.
- Surface Maintenance: Maintaining consistent, high-quality ice surfaces requires specialized equipment and technical knowledge, particularly in facilities that host competitive hockey or figure skating events.
- Scheduling Optimization: Balancing public skating sessions with hockey leagues, figure skating programs, and special events requires sophisticated scheduling systems and community-focused decision making.
- Seasonal Transitions: For facilities that convert between ice and non-ice uses throughout the year, managing these transitions efficiently is crucial for financial sustainability.
SFC’s expansion provides opportunities to implement standardized best practices across all these areas while still adapting to each facility’s unique characteristics and community needs.
Economic Sustainability Models
The economic sustainability of ice facilities often depends on finding the right balance between:
- Core Ice Programming: Hockey leagues, figure skating programs, and learn-to-skate classes that provide consistent revenue.
- Public Access: Open skating sessions that serve broader community needs while generating admission and rental revenue.
- Speciality Events: Tournaments, exhibitions, and special events that drive periodic revenue surges and community engagement.
- Secondary Revenue Streams: Pro shops, concessions, birthday parties, and corporate events that complement primary ice-related activities.
With its expanded portfolio, SFC can analyze performance data across multiple facilities to identify optimal programming mixes for different market types, facility sizes, and community demographics. This data-driven approach supports more sustainable operations while better serving community needs.
Community Impact and Engagement Strategies
Ice Facilities as Community Hubs
Beyond their role as sports venues, ice facilities often function as vital community gathering places. Kelly Kryukov’s statement emphasizes this perspective: “Ice rinks serve as vital community hubs—whether it’s for youth hockey, figure skating, or public skating sessions.”
This community-hub approach manifests in several ways:
- Multi-Generational Programming: Offerings that span from toddler learn-to-skate programs to senior skating clubs.
- Accessibility Initiatives: Adaptive skating programs, scholarship opportunities, and community outreach to ensure facilities serve diverse populations.
- Health and Wellness Focus: Positioning recreational skating as an enjoyable fitness activity accessible to a broader audience than competitive sports.
- Social Connection: Creating spaces where community members can gather, connect, and build relationships through shared activities.
SFC’s expansion creates opportunities to implement successful community engagement strategies across a broader network, potentially enhancing the social impact of these facilities while simultaneously improving their financial sustainability.
Balancing Elite Training with Recreational Access
A perennial challenge for ice facility operators is balancing the needs of elite athletes and teams with broader community access. Many facilities must accommodate:
- Elite Training Programs: Competitive hockey teams and figure skaters who require prime-time ice slots and specialized facilities.
- Developmental Programs: Youth leagues and programs that serve as pipelines for future elite athletes.
- Recreational Users: Community members seeking casual skating opportunities for fitness and enjoyment.
- Special Populations: School groups, adaptive programs, and senior activities that serve specific community segments.
With data and best practices from multiple facilities, SFC is positioned to develop more sophisticated scheduling models that better serve these diverse stakeholder groups. The company’s scale also provides opportunities to implement technological solutions for more efficient facility usage and scheduling transparency.
Future Trends in Recreational Facility Management
Technology Integration in Facility Operations
The consolidation trend in facility management coincides with increasing technology adoption. Companies with larger portfolios like SFC can more readily invest in:
- Advanced Scheduling Systems: Online platforms that optimize facility usage and improve customer experience.
- Energy Management Technology: Sophisticated systems that reduce environmental impact and operational costs.
- Customer Relationship Management: Data-driven approaches to understanding user needs and preferences.
- Virtual Programming: Online coaching, training resources, and community engagement that complement in-person activities.
As SFC integrates these 15 new facilities into its network, communities may benefit from technological advancements that might be financially out of reach for independent operators or municipal facilities with limited budgets.
Public-Private Partnership Models
The recreational facility landscape increasingly includes various partnership models between public entities and private management companies. This trend is evident in the diverse ownership structures within SFC’s expanded portfolio, which includes:
- Municipally-Owned Facilities: Venues like Metro Park Toledo Glass City Ice & Roller, where public ownership is paired with private management expertise.
- Privately-Owned Community Assets: Facilities built and owned by private entities but operated as community recreational resources.
- Mixed-Use Development Components: Ice facilities integrated into larger commercial developments, like The Parks Mall at Arlington.
These varied partnership models represent the evolution of recreational facility development and management, recognizing that neither purely public nor purely private approaches always serve communities optimally. SFC’s experience across multiple partnership structures positions the company to help communities develop sustainable models that leverage the strengths of both public and private approaches.
Conclusion: The Future of Recreational Facility Networks
The Sports Facilities Companies’ expansion represents more than just business growth; it signals the continued evolution of recreational facility management toward more integrated, professional networks that can better serve communities while achieving financial sustainability. Through this strategic move, SFC now manages 20 ice rinks nationwide, including prominent venues in major metropolitan markets.
For communities whose facilities are transitioning to SFC management, this change likely means access to more sophisticated operational systems, expanded programming options, and the benefits of best practices developed across a national network. For the recreational facility industry as a whole, this expansion demonstrates the continuing trend toward consolidation and partnership models that bring together complementary strengths.
As Jason Clement, CEO of The Sports Facilities Companies, noted: “By integrating their experience with our proven approach to operations and community service, we are enhancing our ability to deliver exceptional outcomes for athletes, guests, and the communities we serve.” This integration of experience and proven approaches may well represent the future of successful recreational facility management.
The collaboration between SFC and RMS also suggests a maturing industry where cooperation sometimes produces better outcomes than competition alone. As recreational facilities continue to evolve as vital community assets, this balanced approach to growth and management may become increasingly important for sustainable success.
YSBR provides this content on an “as is” basis without any warranties, express or implied. We do not assume responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, legality, reliability, or use of the information, including any images, videos, or licenses associated with this article. For any concerns, including copyright issues or complaints, please contact YSBR directly.
