Key Takeaways
- Argues NIL opportunities are driving families toward football, basketball, and volleyball
- Women’s volleyball youth participation grew 33% in one year, adding nearly 13,000 players according to i9 Sports
- Youth lacrosse participation dropped 23% while wrestling fell 11% amid sports consolidation trend
- Team sports participation among ages 6-12 declined from 44.5% to 40% over five years per Aspen Institute
- Industry executive warns of long-term consequences for athletic diversity and youth access
Youth sports executives are grappling with a fundamental shift as Name, Image, and Likeness (NIL) opportunities reshape how families approach athletic participation. According to a new opinion piece by Tom Kuhr, senior vice president of marketing at sports operations company Fastbreak AI, the college sports compensation revolution is creating downstream effects that could fundamentally alter the youth sports landscape.
The Data Behind Sports Consolidation
Kuhr’s analysis points to measurable shifts in youth participation patterns that align with NIL earning potential. Women’s volleyball represents the clearest example of this trend, with i9 Sports reporting 33% growth in youth participation over just one year, adding nearly 13,000 new players to the sport.
The growth comes as volleyball gains visibility through college NIL success stories and expanding professional infrastructure. Meanwhile, other sports are experiencing notable declines. Youth lacrosse participation has fallen 23%, while wrestling participation dropped more than 11%. Baseball, traditionally considered foundational to American youth sports, has also seen participation decline, particularly in underserved communities.
These participation shifts reflect what Kuhr describes as families making “sharper, more strategic choices” about athletic investments based on perceived NIL pathways. The trend appears to be concentrating youth sports activity around three primary sports: football, basketball, and volleyball.
Broader Youth Sports Participation Trends
The consolidation occurs against a backdrop of overall declining youth sports participation. Data from the Aspen Institute’s Project Play shows team sports participation among children ages 6 to 12 dropped from 44.5% to 40% over the past five years.
Kuhr argues this decline reflects more than simple market forces, suggesting families are being pushed toward early specialization and away from multi-sport participation. His analysis indicates children are now expected to “pick a lane by age 10” rather than exploring multiple athletic options.
The opinion piece contends that families unable to afford private coaching, tournament travel, or recruiting services are increasingly excluded from competitive pathways. Additionally, athletes who develop later physically, mentally, or emotionally face reduced opportunities to enter established sports pipelines.
House v. NCAA Settlement Impact
The House v. NCAA antitrust settlement serves as a catalyst for these changes, according to Kuhr’s analysis. The settlement established new frameworks for athlete compensation that extend beyond direct payments to include back pay and ongoing compensation structures.
Kuhr characterizes the settlement as transferring power from the NCAA to conferences, donor-led collectives, media companies, and individual athletes. While this creates new revenue opportunities for some athletes, he argues it also removes coordinated structure from college athletics.
The opinion piece suggests this power shift will widen the gap between revenue-generating sports and Olympic or non-revenue sports, with financial resources, media attention, and NIL opportunities continuing to concentrate around profitable programs.
Strategic Implications for Youth Sports Organizations
For youth sports operators, these trends present both challenges and opportunities. Organizations focused on football, basketball, and volleyball may see increased demand and participation. However, sports outside these three categories could face declining enrollment and reduced family investment.
Kuhr’s analysis suggests youth sports organizations should prepare for a landscape where fewer children participate in multiple sports and families make earlier, more strategic decisions about athletic focus. This could impact facility utilization, program structure, and revenue models across different sports.
The consolidation trend also raises questions about long-term athlete development and the traditional benefits of multi-sport participation, including reduced injury rates and improved overall athleticism.
Industry Adaptation
Kuhr’s opinion piece warns that treating “every sport like a business and every athlete like a brand” risks burnout among young participants. However, he also suggests the industry can adapt by supporting both revenue-generating sports and overlooked programs while preserving elements of play and joy in youth athletics.
The analysis indicates youth sports organizations will need to balance commercial opportunities with traditional development goals. This may require new approaches to programming, facility management, and family engagement as the industry adapts to NIL-influenced participation patterns.
As college athletics continue evolving under new compensation frameworks, youth sports operators face the challenge of maintaining diverse programming while responding to shifting family priorities and participation trends.
image: Perlman+Perlman
YSBR provides this content on an “as is” basis without any warranties, express or implied. We do not assume responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, legality, reliability, or use of the information, including any images, videos, or licenses associated with this article. For any concerns, including copyright issues or complaints, please contact YSBR directly.
About Youth Sports Business Report
Youth Sports Business Report is the largest and most trusted source for youth sports industry news, insights, and analysis covering the $54 billion youth sports market. Trusted by over 50,000 followers including industry executives, investors, youth sports parents and sports business professionals, we are the premier destination for comprehensive youth sports business intelligence.
Our core mission: Make Youth Sports Better. As the leading authority in youth sports business reporting, we deliver unparalleled coverage of sports business trends, youth athletics, and emerging opportunities across the youth sports ecosystem.
Our expert editorial team provides authoritative, in-depth reporting on key youth sports industry verticals including:
- Sports sponsorship and institutional capital (Private Equity, Venture Capital)
- Youth Sports events and tournament management
- NIL (Name, Image, Likeness) developments and compliance
- Youth sports coaching and sports recruitment strategies
- Sports technology and data analytics innovation
- Youth sports facilities development and management
- Sports content creation and digital media monetization
Whether you’re a sports industry executive, institutional investor, youth sports parent, coach, or sports business enthusiast, Youth Sports Business Report is your most reliable source for the actionable sports business insights you need to stay ahead of youth athletics trends and make informed decisions in the rapidly evolving youth sports landscape.
Join our growing community of 50,000+ industry leaders who depend on our trusted youth sports business analysis to drive success in the youth sports industry.
Stay connected with the pulse of the youth sports business – where industry expertise meets actionable intelligence.
Sign up for the biggest newsletter in Youth Sports – Youth Sports HQ – The best youth sports newsletter in the industry
Follow Youth Sports Business Report Founder Cameron Korab on LinkedIn
